March for Our Lives, the gun-control group founded after the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., has issued what it has termed a “peace plan.” A better description might be, “A Comprehensive Plan to Abolish the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.”
At its core, the program seeks to transmute gun ownership from a liberty that can be asserted against the government into a privilege that Americans can enjoy only with the permission of the state. Or, to put it another way, the program aims to repeal the Second Amendment without going through all that unpleasant “written-amendment” stuff.
Change the meaning of “the right of the people”
That’s not hyperbole. By its own admission, March for Our Lives wants to “reexamine the District of Columbia v. Heller interpretation of the Second Amendment,” which, in practice, would mean asking the U.S. Supreme Court to revise the Second Amendment’s obvious meaning so that “the right of the people” does not mean “the right of the people” anymore.
Over 19,000 Americans are using the system in their homes… (and that’s just in the last three months). They get unlimited energy for less than 50 cents a day…
Without paying one nickel more to their electricity provider! If you’re skeptical…Just watch this short video… and you’ll be able to cut your power bills to almost ZERO in just 45 minutes!
Worse still, the group is demanding that “the next generation of federal judges” must act not as impartial arbiters of the law, but as “champions of gun violence prevention.”
Which they’d pretty much have to if the group’s other ideas are to have a chance of surviving the judicial review they would inevitably provoke.
Multi-Step Approval Process
Were the “peace plan” to be adopted in toto by Congress, Americans seeking to obtain firearms would be obliged to go through a “multi-step approval process” that would be “overseen by a law enforcement agency.”
They would be required to register their guns—and themselves—with the federal government.
They would be forbidden from purchasing standard-capacity magazines, barred from owning the most-popular rifle in America and subjected to both waiting periods and limitations on the number of firearms they could legally buy in a month.
They would be on the receiving end of hefty purchase taxes and licensing fees that, in practice, would have the primary effect of making it more difficult for poorer people to own firearms.
And they would be subjected to a massive and unprecedented confiscation drive, the unabashed aim of which would be to “reduce the estimated 265–393 million firearms in circulation by at least 30 percent.”
Given the rank extremism of these ideas, it should perhaps come as no surprise that, at the heart of the agenda, there is also an open call for the federal government to go after the NRA and, one presumes, to shut it up.
Lock-step Agenda with the Democratic party
In essence, March for Our Lives’ “peace plan” is the full-scale, non-euphemized version of the agenda that the institutional Democratic party is, by baby steps, coming gradually to adopt.
The aims are uncannily alike:
First, to clear away the Second Amendment as an obstacle within the courts;
Second, to remove the NRA as a means by which America’s pro-gun majority can channel its political voice;
Third, to remove the most popular guns in the United States from the market—and, if possible, from their owner’s homes;
Finally, to introduce so many legislative roadblocks between the individual and the opportunity to bear arms that, at least in the “blue” states, that individual would give up trying.
“Common-sense regulation” becomes “There is no right to bear arms”
Until recently, “common-sense regulation” was the language of the hour. Now we are being told that, in fact, there is no right to bear arms—and that, insofar as such a “privilege” will be tolerated in America, it will be on limited, costly, intrusive and narrow terms.
This transformation has been dramatic. Almost overnight, the insistence that “nobody is coming for your guns” has been replaced with the admission that actually they are—and they want the “in common-use” ones, too.
This year alone, “all we want is background checks” has been thrown out in favor of a byzantine system in which prospective gun owners would have to obtain a federal license, satisfy a police officer and place themselves onto a national database.
Within the space of a few months, we have gone from hearing warnings about the importance of U.S. Supreme Court precedent to the explicit request that future judges behave like activists.
If you want to know where Beto O’Rourke, Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren are going to end up on this question of guns, look no further than March for Our Lives.
Let nobody say we weren’t warned. The playbook has been published for all to see. What we do with it is up to us.
If you’re interested in learning more old remedies, you should read The Lost Book Of Remedies.
The physical book has 300 pages, with 3 colored pictures for every plant and for every medicine.It was written by Claude Davis, whose grandfather was one of the greatest healers in America. Claude took his grandfather’s lifelong plant journal, which he used to treat thousands of people, and adapted it into this book.
newslyblog.home.blog 
There will come a time when these “Champions” of Gun Confiscation will have to be redefined as Cold Blooded Terrorists & then Must be Summarily Executed for Crimes Against Humanity. Get it? Nah they won’t get it until that moment just before Execution. What goes around Comes around Hypocrites.
LikeLike
If the leftist win or steal the next election all we have left is retribution against the communist in washington,education,hollywood.We will never surrender our God given rights to them.
LikeLike
What Next? US Bans All Russian Nukes?
The police do NOT “have a duty” to protect you. “The Supreme Court has made it clear numerous times . . . A police officer can let the public take the risk, take [the risk] upon himself or put it on the individual who brings the danger in the first place. The police can and HAVE stand back and watch you be murdered and they are perfectly within “the rules”. That’s what law enforcement is for — to protect the community(the government). They have to protect themselves [first] to do that.” http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX80P9fRdlY good video
If “they” take your Means of self-defense then “they” TAKE ON
(1) the burden of protecting every person 24/7
(2) the FULL FINANCIAL RESTITUTION and Medical Bills of ANY person they fail to protect.
(3) Replacement Repair and Pain & Suffering for ANY loss due to their failure to stop every burgler, thief, etc.
LikeLike
We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment.
Find one government in all of history that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHT to arms.
The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
The 2nd Amendment clearly codifies the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”? Of course not. …………. That is assumed.
the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a “well regulated militia” it is the right of the people, We the people were BORN WITH UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, meaning they come from GOD.
LikeLike
People wake up!!!!, Federal law does not apply within the States, except for interstate commerce.
That goes for Federal income tax also. Go on Pacer and look up United States of America v. Robert Lain, Amelia Lain no. 2:17-cv-00113-ABJ District of Wyoming. The case is on pacer except for Mr. Lain’s Motion for summary judgment which was marked “not for publication”. That document proves with self authenticating gov. Documents how the Attorney General’s office steals your identity and creates the SOcial security account whereby the IRS then steals your wealth.
Note: even if you volunteer into the Social security system, you are vested in 40 quarters. That means you own nothing else. Check it out, Social security Act.
LikeLike
Have you ever noticed that an abundant society always is targeted by those you want power and use the struggling masses of the world to come and take what they want… Why is it the have-nots are always victimized by tyrants who through unprecedented greed promise the world and deliver hell instead? The obvious is before us: greed, anger and ignorance is the main stay of humanity. Liberation from suffering comes only after a sincere quest for personal awareness and the true nature of reality is sought. The endless cycle of suffering is all around us, yet through suffering liberation is recognized. May you all have happiness and peace in your life time. Remember no happiness is permanent in this material world.
LikeLike
It’s fitting this trash comes out of the Illuminati bastion of Broward County on the Gold Coast, the home to the largest protected pedophile operation in the U.S. The Globalists own Broward County and it’s officials and elected Representatives from the lowest city official all the way to Congress. The people behind this push are the enemies of America and want us disarmed and enslaved…time to fight!
LikeLike
It is always someones idea to get your guns, but they are never the one to come and get them… either learn to Drive a weapon or ride in a box car to a fema camp.
LikeLike
Websters Dictionary 1828: “MILITIA”
MILI’TIA, noun [Latin from miles, a soldier; Gr. war, to fight, combat, contention. The primary sense of fighting is to strive, struggle, drive, or to strike, to beat, Eng. moil, Latin molior; Heb. to labor or toil.] The body of soldiers in a state enrolled for discipline, but not engaged in actual service except in emergencies; as distinguished from regular troops, whose sole occupation is war or military service. The militia of a country are the able bodied men organized into companies, regiments and brigades, with officers of all grades, and required by law to attend military exercises on certain days only, but at other times left to pursue their usual occupations.
LikeLike
Websters Dictionary 1828: “ARMS”
‘ARMS, noun plural [Latin arma.]
1. Weapons of offense, or armor for defense and protection of the body.
2. War; hostility.
Arms and the man I sing.
To be in arms to be in a state of hostility, or in a military life.
To arms is a phrase which denotes a taking arms for war or hostility; particularly, a summoning to war.
To take arms is to arm for attack or defense.
Bred to arms denotes that a person has been educated to the profession of a soldier.
3. The ensigns armorial of a family; consisting of figures and colors borne in shields, banners, etc., as marks of dignity and distinction, and descending from father to son.
4. In law, arms are any thing which a man takes in his hand in anger, to strike or assault another.
5. In botany, one of the seven species of fulcra or props of plants, enumerated by Linne and others. The different species of arms or armor, are prickles, thorns, forks and stings, which seem intended to protect the plants from injury by animals.
Sire arms are such as may be charged with powder, as cannon, muskets, mortars, etc.
A stand of arms consists of a musket, bayonet, cartridge-box and belt, with a sword. But for common soldiers a sword is not necessary.
In falconry, arms are the legs of a hawk from the thigh to the foot.
LikeLike
Websters Dictionary 1828: “DEER RIFLE”
No results found.
Please check your spelling.
Try unpluralized words or use a root word.
For further assistance visit our Facebook page.
It is very plain that the INTENT of the 2nd Amendment is for WAR. Weapons of war, which include so-called Assault Rifles, and any other “ARMS” carried for the PURPOSE OF WAR.
Any Democrat COMMUNIST/NAZI Registration or Confiscation, is not only an Infringement and Affront, it is also an ACT OF WAR, by ENEMIES of the People.
In such case it is time to take up ARMS against them, to destroy those who intend to destroy us, and the BLOOD that bought our Liberty and Freedom.
A Minimum of 250 MILLION Innocents and Powerless were DISARMED by Communist and Nazis just like the Democrats, in the last Century. They were then MURDERED by the SAME.
LikeLike
THERE ARE 20,000,000 foreign military troops in america who are paid $500 dollars a day to be here,their job is to go door to door and take your weapons EVEN IF THEY HAVE TO KILL EVERYONE IN THE HOUSE TO GET THEM,when the right PRESIDENT COMES TO POWER ..IT WILL HAPPEN,its a good thing all you morons are rich or you wouldn’t allow this,OH you say your broke,THEN WHY ARE YOU STILL KISSING THESE THIEVES ASS??…Maybe your a typical american butt licker, who only watches Football all day,and spends the weekend drunk and your kids have Never been out side,YOUR going to die soon and it will be GOOD RIDDENCE….THERE ARE MILLIONS of kids who have NO ONE to take them anywhere,their mothers are lisbiens and are scared of the forest,and the wild animals,IF your a man,TAKE THESE KIDS OUT AND HAVE SOME FUN,most of them have NEVER seen a real man,theres not many of them in america any more,just queers,homo’s,girlymen,losers…
LikeLike
“…“reexamine the District of Columbia v. Heller interpretation of the Second Amendment,” which, in practice, would mean asking the U.S. Supreme Court to revise the Second Amendment’s obvious meaning…”. They can ‘examine’ and ‘ask’ all the hell they want….FAIL Bill of Rights is the Law of the Land, PERIOD. If they wanna ANOTHER Lexington, fine. Just be honest about it!
LikeLike